What must be advised to a suspect in custody under the Miranda decision?

The Miranda decision, established by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1966, requires law enforcement to inform a suspect in custody of specific rights before interrogation commences. This is intended to protect the suspect's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and their Sixth Amendment right to legal counsel.

The correct response indicates that suspects must be advised of their right to remain silent and to have an attorney present. This means that the suspect is informed that they do not have to answer questions or provide any information that may incriminate them and that they have the right to consult with an attorney, who can be present during questioning. This safeguard ensures that any statements made by the suspect are voluntary and informed, thus protecting their legal rights during the criminal justice process.

The other options presented relate to rights that are important in different contexts but do not pertain to the interrogation process under the Miranda ruling. The right to a speedy trial and the right to confront witnesses are part of the trial process rather than custodial interrogation. The right to refuse bail and remain silent, while potentially relevant in a broader legal context, does not specifically address the requirements of the Miranda warning. Lastly, the right to appeal and to have a jury trial are rights that come into play after charges