The case of State of Oklahoma vs Woods gives LEOs the right to withdraw and hold blood from which type of individual?

The case of State of Oklahoma vs Woods is significant in clarifying the legal authority of law enforcement officers regarding the collection of blood samples. In this case, the ruling establishes that law enforcement has the right to withdraw and hold blood from unconscious persons. This is crucial because, in emergency situations where a person is unable to provide consent for a blood draw (such as in the case of an unconscious individual), the law permits law enforcement to act in order to obtain evidence that may be vital for investigations, particularly in instances of suspected driving under the influence.

This legal precedent allows officers to prioritize public safety and evidence preservation when immediate consent cannot be obtained due to the victim's or suspect's medical condition. The ability to collect blood from someone who is unconscious is particularly important in DUI cases, as it helps establish the level of impairment and can contribute significantly to the prosecution of a case.