During what circumstances can a police officer's authority to use force become justified?

A police officer's authority to use force is justified primarily in situations where it is necessary to defend themselves or others from imminent harm. This principle is rooted in the need for self-preservation and the protection of innocent parties. When an officer perceives a genuine threat that could result in serious injury or death to themselves or any person, the use of force is considered appropriate to neutralize that threat.

This justification aims to ensure that law enforcement can effectively perform their duties while also ensuring public safety. The decision to use force must be reasonable and proportional to the threat encountered, aligning with established use-of-force policies and legal standards.

In contrast, while a suspect being non-compliant, a high-speed chase, or the enforcement of an arrest warrant may create situations where force could be contemplated, these scenarios do not inherently justify the use of force without an immediate threat to safety. Compliance issues or pursuit alone do not automatically elevate the level of force that can be justified; the focus must primarily remain on the necessity of protecting life and preventing harm.